🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion say that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the options. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in life after death, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.